GET PROFESSIONAL CBIC CIC QUESTION EXPLANATIONS AND RELIABLE TEST BOOK

Get Professional CBIC CIC Question Explanations and Reliable Test Book

Get Professional CBIC CIC Question Explanations and Reliable Test Book

Blog Article

Tags: CIC Question Explanations, Test CIC Book, Latest CIC Exam Discount, Test CIC Collection Pdf, CIC Certification Sample Questions

In order to help you easily get your desired CBIC CIC certification, CBIC is here to provide you with the CBIC CIC exam dumps. We need to adapt to our ever-changing reality. To prepare for the actual CBIC CIC Exam, you can use our CBIC CIC exam dumps.

Free demos offered by Exams4sures gives users a chance to try the product before buying. Users can get an idea of the CIC exam dumps, helping them determine if it's a good fit for their needs. The demo provides access to a limited portion of the CIC dumps material to give users a better understanding of the content. Overall, Exams4sures CBIC Certified Infection Control Exam (CIC) free demo is a valuable opportunity for users to assess the value of the Exams4sures's study material before making a purchase. The Exams4sures provides 1 year of free updates of real questions. This offer allows students to stay up-to-date with changes in the exam's content.

>> CIC Question Explanations <<

How To Pass CBIC CIC Exam On First Attempt

When preparing for the CIC exam, a good source of information is what candidates need most, and the price of the materials is one of the important factors to be considered when a candidate choosing. In contrast to most exam preparation materials available online, our CIC exam materials of Exams4sures can be obtained at a reasonable price so that each candidate who prepares to take the CIC exam can afford it. It will not let any one of the candidates be worried about the price issue, and its quality and advantages exceed all our competitors' similar products. We will never reduce the quality of our CIC Exam Questions because the price is easy to bear by candidates and the quality of our exam questions will not let you down. They will prove the best choice for your time and money.

CBIC Certified Infection Control Exam Sample Questions (Q88-Q93):

NEW QUESTION # 88
A nurse claims to have acquired hepatitis A virus infection as the result of occupational exposure. The source patient had an admitting diagnosis of viral hepatitis. Further investigation of this incident reveals a 5-day interval between exposure and onset of symptoms in the nurse. The patient has immunoglobulin G antibodies to hepatitis A. From the evidence, the infection preventionist may correctly conclude which of the following?

  • A. The 5-day incubation period is consistent with hepatitis A virus transmission.
  • B. The patient has serologic evidence of recent hepatitis A viral infection.
  • C. The nurse should be given hepatitis A virus immunoglobulin.
  • D. The evidence at this time fails to support the nurse's claim.

Answer: D

Explanation:
The infection preventionist's (IP) best conclusion, based on the provided evidence, is that the evidence at this time fails to support the nurse's claim of acquiring hepatitis A virus (HAV) infection through occupational exposure. This conclusion is grounded in the clinical and epidemiological understanding of HAV, as aligned with the Certification Board of Infection Control and Epidemiology (CBIC) guidelines. Hepatitis A typically has an incubation period ranging from 15 to 50 days, with an average of approximately 28-30 days, following exposure to the virus (CBIC Practice Analysis, 2022, Domain I: Identification of Infectious Disease Processes, Competency 1.3 - Apply principles of epidemiology). The reported 5-day interval between exposure and symptom onset in the nurse is significantly shorter than the expected incubation period, making it inconsistent with HAV transmission. Additionally, the presence of immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies in the source patient indicates past exposure or immunity to HAV, rather than an active or recent infection, which would typically be associated with immunoglobulin M (IgM) antibodies during the acute phase.
Option A (the nurse should be given hepatitis A virus immunoglobulin) is not supported because post- exposure prophylaxis with HAV immunoglobulin is recommended only within 14 days of exposure to a confirmed case with active infection, and the evidence here does not confirm a recent exposure or active case.
Option C (the patient has serologic evidence of recent hepatitis A viral infection) is incorrect because IgG antibodies signify past infection or immunity, not a recent infection, which would require IgM antibodies.
Option D (the 5-day incubation period is consistent with hepatitis A virus transmission) is inaccurate due to the mismatch with the known incubation period of HAV.
The IP's role includes critically evaluating epidemiological data to determine the likelihood of transmission events. The discrepancy in the incubation period and the serologic status of the patient suggest that the nurse's claim may not be substantiated by the current evidence, necessitating further investigation rather than immediate intervention or acceptance of the claim. This aligns with CBIC's emphasis on accurate identification and investigation of infectious disease processes (CBIC Practice Analysis, 2022, Domain I:
Identification of Infectious Disease Processes, Competency 1.2 - Investigate suspected outbreaks or exposures).
References: CBIC Practice Analysis, 2022, Domain I: Identification of Infectious Disease Processes, Competencies 1.2 - Investigate suspected outbreaks or exposures, 1.3 - Apply principles of epidemiology.


NEW QUESTION # 89
An infection preventionist (IP) encounters a surgeon at the nurse's station who loudly disagrees with the IP's surgical site infection findings. The IP's BEST response is to:

  • A. Calmly explain that the findings are credible.
  • B. Report the surgeon to the chief of staff.
  • C. Ask the surgeon to change their tone and leave the nurses' station if they refuse.
  • D. Ask the surgeon to speak in a more private setting to review their concerns.

Answer: D

Explanation:
The scenario involves a conflict between an infection preventionist (IP) and a surgeon regarding surgical site infection (SSI) findings, occurring in a public setting (the nurse's station). The IP's response must align with professional communication standards, infection control priorities, and the principles of collaboration and conflict resolution as emphasized by the Certification Board of Infection Control and Epidemiology (CBIC).
The "best" response should de-escalate the situation, maintain professionalism, and facilitate a constructive dialogue. Let's evaluate each option:
* A. Report the surgeon to the chief of staff: Reporting the surgeon to the chief of staff might be considered if the behavior escalates or violates policy (e.g., harassment or disruption), but it is an escalation that should be a last resort. This action does not address the immediate disagreement about the SSI findings or attempt to resolve the issue collaboratively. It could also strain professional relationships and is not the best initial response, as it bypasses direct communication.
* B. Calmly explain that the findings are credible: Explaining the credibility of the findings is important and demonstrates the IP's confidence in their work, which is based on evidence-based infection control practices. However, doing so in a public setting like the nurse's station, especially with a loud disagreement, may not be effective. The surgeon may feel challenged or defensive, potentially worsening the situation. While this response has merit, it lacks consideration of the setting and the need for privacy to discuss sensitive data.
* C. Ask the surgeon to speak in a more private setting to review their concerns: This response is the most appropriate as it addresses the immediate need to de-escalate the public confrontation and move the discussion to a private setting. It shows respect for the surgeon's concerns, maintains professionalism, and allows the IP to review the SSI findings (e.g., data collection methods, definitions, or surveillance techniques) in a controlled environment. This aligns with CBIC's emphasis on effective communication and collaboration with healthcare teams, as well as the need to protect patient confidentiality and maintain a professional atmosphere. It also provides an opportunity to educate the surgeon on the evidence behind the findings, which is a key IP role.
* D. Ask the surgeon to change their tone and leave the nurses' station if they refuse: Requesting a change in tone is reasonable given the loud disagreement, but demanding the surgeon leave if they refuse is confrontational and risks escalating the conflict. This approach could damage the working relationship and does not address the underlying disagreement about the SSI findings. While maintaining a respectful environment is important, this response prioritizes control over collaboration and is less constructive than seeking a private discussion.
The best response is C, as it promotes a professional, collaborative approach by moving the conversation to a private setting. This allows the IP to address the surgeon's concerns, explain the SSI surveillance methodology (e.g., NHSN definitions or CBIC guidelines), and maintain a positive working relationship, which is critical for effective infection prevention programs. This strategy reflects CBIC's focus on leadership, communication, and teamwork in healthcare settings.
References:
* CBIC Infection Prevention and Control (IPC) Core Competency Model (updated 2023), Domain V:
Management and Communication, which stresses effective interpersonal communication and conflict resolution.
* CBIC Examination Content Outline, Domain V: Leadership and Program Management, which includes collaborating with healthcare personnel and addressing disagreements professionally.
* CDC Guidelines for SSI Surveillance (2023), which emphasize the importance of clear communication of findings to healthcare teams.


NEW QUESTION # 90
An infection preventionist (IP) observes an increase in primary bloodstream infections in patients admitted through the Emergency Department. Poor technique is suspected when peripheral intravenous (IV) catheters are inserted. The IP should FIRST stratify infections by:

  • A. Location of IV insertion: pre-hospital, Emergency Department, or in-patient unit.
  • B. Site of insertion: hand, forearm, or antecubital fossa.
  • C. Type of dressing used: gauze, CHG impregnated sponge, or transparent.
  • D. Type of skin preparation used for the IV site: alcohol, CHG/alcohol, or iodophor.

Answer: A

Explanation:
When an infection preventionist (IP) identifies an increase in primary bloodstream infections (BSIs) associated with peripheral intravenous (IV) catheter insertion, the initial step in outbreak investigation and process improvement is to stratify the data to identify potential sources or patterns of infection. According to the Certification Board of Infection Control and Epidemiology (CBIC), the "Surveillance and Epidemiologic Investigation" domain emphasizes the importance of systematically analyzing data to pinpoint contributing factors, such as location, technique, or equipment use, in healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). The question specifies poor technique as a suspected cause, and the first step should focus on contextual factors that could influence technique variability.
Option A, stratifying infections by the location of IV insertion (pre-hospital, Emergency Department, or in- patient unit), is the most logical first step. Different settings may involve varying levels of training, staffing, time pressure, or adherence to aseptic technique, all of which can impact infection rates. For example, pre- hospital settings (e.g., ambulance services) may have less controlled environments or less experienced personnel compared to in-patient units, potentially leading to technique inconsistencies. The CDC's Guidelines for the Prevention of Intravascular Catheter-Related Infections (2017) recommend evaluating the context of catheter insertion as a critical initial step in investigating BSIs, making this a priority for the IP to identify where the issue is most prevalent.
Option B, stratifying by the type of dressing used (gauze, CHG impregnated sponge, or transparent), is important but should follow initial location-based analysis. Dressings play a role in maintaining catheter site integrity and preventing infection, but their impact is secondary to the insertion technique itself. Option C, stratifying by the site of insertion (hand, forearm, or antecubital fossa), is also relevant, as anatomical sites differ in infection risk (e.g., the hand may be more prone to contamination), but this is a more specific factor to explore after broader contextual data is assessed. Option D, stratifying by the type of skin preparation used (alcohol, CHG/alcohol, or iodophor), addresses antiseptic efficacy, which is a key component of technique.
However, without first understanding where the insertions occur, it's premature to focus on skin preparation alone, as technique issues may stem from systemic factors across locations.
The CBIC Practice Analysis (2022) supports a stepwise approach to HAI investigation, starting with broad stratification (e.g., by location) to guide subsequent detailed analysis (e.g., technique-specific factors). This aligns with the CDC's hierarchical approach to infection prevention, where contextual data collection precedes granular process evaluation. Therefore, the IP should first stratify by location to establish a baseline for further investigation.
References:
* CBIC Practice Analysis, 2022.
* CDC Guidelines for the Prevention of Intravascular Catheter-Related Infections, 2017.


NEW QUESTION # 91
Which of the following represents a class II surgical wound?

  • A. Old traumatic wounds with retained devitalized tissue.
  • B. Incisions in which acute, nonpurulent inflammation are seen.
  • C. Incisions involving the biliary tract, appendix, vagina, and oropharynx.
  • D. Incisional wounds following nonpenetrating (blunt) trauma.

Answer: B

Explanation:
Surgical wounds are classified by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) into four classes based on the degree of contamination and the likelihood of postoperative infection. This classification system, detailed in the CDC's Guidelines for Prevention of Surgical Site Infections (1999), is a cornerstone of infection prevention and control, aligning with the Certification Board of Infection Control and Epidemiology (CBIC) standards in the "Prevention and Control of Infectious Diseases" domain. The classes are as follows:
* Class I (Clean): Uninfected operative wounds with no inflammation, typically closed primarily, and not involving the respiratory, alimentary, genital, or urinary tracts.
* Class II (Clean-Contaminated): Operative wounds with controlled entry into a sterile or minimally contaminated tract (e.g., biliary or gastrointestinal), with no significant spillage or infection present.
* Class III (Contaminated): Open, fresh wounds with significant spillage (e.g., from a perforated viscus) or major breaks in sterile technique.
* Class IV (Dirty-Infected): Old traumatic wounds with retained devitalized tissue or existing clinical infection.
Option A, "Incisions in which acute, nonpurulent inflammation are seen," aligns with a Class II surgical wound. The presence of acute, nonpurulent inflammation suggests a controlled inflammatory response without overt infection, which can occur in clean-contaminated cases where a sterile tract (e.g., during elective gastrointestinal surgery) is entered under controlled conditions. The CDC defines Class II wounds as those involving minor contamination without significant spillage or infection, and nonpurulent inflammation fits this category, often seen in early postoperative monitoring.
Option B, "Incisional wounds following nonpenetrating (blunt) trauma," does not fit the Class II definition.
These wounds are typically classified based on the trauma context and are more likely to be considered contaminated (Class III) or dirty (Class IV) if there is tissue damage or delayed treatment, rather than clean- contaminated. Option C, "Incisions involving the biliary tract, appendix, vagina, and oropharynx," describes anatomical sites that, when surgically accessed, often fall into Class II if the procedure is elective and controlled (e.g., cholecystectomy), but the phrasing suggests a general category rather than a specific wound state with inflammation, making it less precise for Class II. Option D, "Old traumatic wounds with retained devitalized tissue," clearly corresponds to Class IV (dirty-infected) due to the presence of necrotic tissue and potential existing infection, which is inconsistent with Class II.
The CBIC Practice Analysis (2022) emphasizes the importance of accurate wound classification for implementing appropriate infection prevention measures, such as antibiotic prophylaxis or sterile technique adjustments. The CDC guidelines further specify that Class II wounds may require tailored interventions based on the observed inflammatory response, supporting Option A as the correct answer. Note that the phrasing in Option A contains a minor grammatical error ("inflammation are seen" should be "inflammation is seen"), but this does not alter the clinical intent or classification.
References:
* CBIC Practice Analysis, 2022.
* CDC Guidelines for Prevention of Surgical Site Infections, 1999.


NEW QUESTION # 92
An infection preventionist, Cancer Committee, and Intravenous Therapy Department are studying the incidence of infections in patients with triple lumen catheters. Which of the following is essential to the quality improvement process?

  • A. Recommendations for intervention must be approved by the governing board.
  • B. Establish subjective criteria for outcome measurement.
  • C. A monitoring system must be in place following implementation of interventions.
  • D. Study criteria must be approved monthly by the Cancer Committee.

Answer: C

Explanation:
The correct answer is D, "A monitoring system must be in place following implementation of interventions," as this is essential to the quality improvement (QI) process. According to the Certification Board of Infection Control and Epidemiology (CBIC) guidelines, a key component of any QI initiative, such as studying the incidence of infections in patients with triple lumen catheters, is the continuous evaluation of interventions to assess their effectiveness and ensure sustained improvement. A monitoring system allows the infection preventionist (IP), Cancer Committee, and Intravenous Therapy Department to track infection rates, identify trends, and make data-driven adjustments to infection control practices post-intervention (CBIC Practice Analysis, 2022, Domain II: Surveillance and Epidemiologic Investigation, Competency 2.4 - Evaluate the effectiveness of infection prevention and control interventions). This step is critical to validate the success of implemented strategies, such as catheter care protocols, and to prevent healthcare-associated infections (HAIs).
Option A (establish subjective criteria for outcome measurement) is not ideal because QI processes rely on objective, measurable outcomes (e.g., infection rates per 1,000 catheter days) rather than subjective criteria to ensure reliability and reproducibility. Option B (recommendations for intervention must be approved by the governing board) is an important step for institutional support and resource allocation, but it is a preparatory action rather than an essential component of the ongoing QI process itself. Option C (study criteria must be approved monthly by the Cancer Committee) suggests an unnecessary administrative burden; while initial approval of study criteria is important, monthly re-approval is not a standard QI requirement unless mandated by specific policies, and it does not directly contribute to the improvement process.
The emphasis on a monitoring system aligns with CBIC's focus on using surveillance data to guide and refine infection prevention efforts, ensuring that interventions for triple lumen catheter-related infections are effective and adaptable (CBIC Practice Analysis, 2022, Domain II: Surveillance and Epidemiologic Investigation, Competency 2.5 - Use data to guide infection prevention and control strategies). This approach supports a cycle of continuous improvement, which is foundational to reducing catheter-associated bloodstream infections (CABSI) in healthcare settings.
References: CBIC Practice Analysis, 2022, Domain II: Surveillance and Epidemiologic Investigation, Competencies 2.4 - Evaluate the effectiveness of infection prevention and control interventions, 2.5 - Use data to guide infection prevention and control strategies.


NEW QUESTION # 93
......

As the authoritative provider of CIC actual exam, we always pursue high pass rate compared with our peers to gain more attention from those potential customers. We guarantee that if you follow the guidance of our CIC learning materials, you will pass the exam without a doubt and get a certificate. Our CIC Exam Practice is carefully compiled after many years of practical effort and is adaptable to the needs of the CIC exam. With high pass rate of more than 98%, you are bound to pass the CIC exam.

Test CIC Book: https://www.exams4sures.com/CBIC/CIC-practice-exam-dumps.html

Exams4sures also offers a demo of the CBIC CIC exam product which is absolutely free, CBIC CIC Question Explanations It will allow you to go through the real exam scenario, For instance, the first step for you is to choose the most suitable CIC actual dumps for your coming exam, CBIC CIC Question Explanations You will not get a passing score if you rely on outdated practice questions.

Finally, he finishes up with a brief history of algebra and some comprehension exercises, Adding/Removing Virtual Machines, Exams4sures also offers a demo of the CBIC CIC Exam product which is absolutely free.

2025 Accurate CIC – 100% Free Question Explanations | Test CBIC Certified Infection Control Exam Book

It will allow you to go through the real exam scenario, For instance, the first step for you is to choose the most suitable CIC actual dumps for your coming exam.

You will not get a passing score if you rely on outdated practice questions, This feature will boost your confidence when taking the CBIC Certified Infection Control Exam (CIC) certification exam.

Report this page